Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
51
Highlights
32
Differences
6
Reactions
0
Likes
Peluso 22 251
vs
Telefunken ELA M 251:
51 Highlights & 32 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Compare pricing, warranty, and specifications to understand value and function differences at a glance.
Not sure which microphone to add to your setup? This microphones comparison puts Peluso 22 251 vs Telefunken ELA M 251 side by side — from power source, stand/tripod, warranty & cable detachable to what players love.
Peluso 22 251 Versus Telefunken ELA M 251: A Battle of Legendary Studio Microphones
When considering professional large-diaphragm tube condenser microphones, the Peluso 22 251 and the Telefunken ELA M 251 are two names that immediately come to mind. Both are designed with the seasoned audio professional in mind, ideal for capturing everything from delicate vocals to detailed instrument recordings.
They share a similar side-address form factor and a compact stature, with heights around 8.5 to 8.85 inches, making them easy to position in any studio setup. However, while Telefunken leans heavily on its iconic legacy with a limited selection of polar patterns, Peluso opts for versatility with a broad palette of seven distinct polar patterns. Their technical builds cater to professionals, but the Peluso offers more detailed performance specs, while the Telefunken emphasizes traditional craftsmanship and glowing LED status indicators.
Versatility and Value Embodied: The Peluso 22 251
The Peluso 22 251 is tailored for the versatile modern pro who demands comprehensive control without sacrificing quality. Its extensive suite of seven polar pattern options, spanning from Cardioid to Hypercardioid, Figure-8, and even Stereo, enables a remarkable range of recording scenarios, from tight vocal isolation to rich ambient instrument captures. The microphone sports a 1.34-inch capsule diameter, precision-engineered to preserve a pristine sound signature. Technical specs like a 200-ohm minimum terminating impedance and a robust 144 dB overload point reveal its capability to handle demanding loud sources without distortion. These features make it easier to pair with diverse preamps and mixing consoles, a key advantage in versatile studio environments.
On the design front, Peluso throws in user-friendly details such as a mounting clip along with a detachable mount and swivel/pivot capability, allowing easy adjustment and secure positioning. Studio pros will appreciate the solid packaging with included carrying case and cables. It is backed by a three-year warranty, underscoring Peluso's confidence in its build quality. All this comes at a fraction of a classic mic's price, with the Peluso 22 251 retailing near $1749 at Reverb.
Timeless Prestige and Studio Identity: Telefunken ELA M 251
The Telefunken ELA M 251 stands as a beacon of studio heritage, revered for its unmistakable tone and association with legendary recordings. It offers a narrower set of three polar patterns: Cardioid, Omni, and Figure-8, that suit traditional recording applications requiring classic tube warmth. The mic aligns with professional needs, supporting high-end vocal and instrument work typically found in top-tier studios. Despite lacking detailed impedance or overload specifications, its enduring reputation assures outstanding performance.
Functionality is underscored by thoughtful features like LED indicator lights for visual monitoring of power status and operation, and a power indicator light that provides immediate operational feedback; conveniences absent from the Peluso. Its durable detachable mount and swivel/pivot capability also ensure flexible positioning. Telefunken further distinguishes itself with compliance to safety and environmental standards, reassuring buyers of its professional-grade manufacturing quality.
All considered, this mic carries an astronomical price tag, upwards of $12,995 at Reverb or more, reflecting both its legendary status and the craftsmanship behind it. Yet, for studios seeking a piece of history rather than only flexibility or specs, Telefunken remains an unrivaled status symbol.
Quick Take
The Peluso 22 251 excels with its broad versatility, offering seven polar patterns and detailed impedance and overload specs, all backed by a solid three-year warranty and practical accessories. Meanwhile, the Telefunken ELA M 251 shines through its historic aura, rugged build, and elegant operation indicators, serving professionals who prize legacy and a classic sound profile above all.
Bottom Line
If you seek a studio mic that delivers professional-grade versatility and substantial value without compromising quality, the Peluso 22 251 is your best bet. Its expansive feature set and wallet-friendly pricing make it an excellent tool for a range of recording scenarios. However, if budget is no concern and the goal is to own a microphone steeped in historic prestige with additional operational conveniences like LED indicators and certified safety standards, the Telefunken ELA M 251 retains its status as an iconic, studio-classic choice.
Verdict
Winner: Peluso 22 251 - For its unmatched versatility, extensive polar patterns, detailed technical specs, and impressive value proposition.
Runner-up: Telefunken ELA M 251 - For legendary status, build quality, and specialized studio heritage, but with a significantly higher cost and fewer features.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Get the full rundown: specs, tone shaping, features, pros, cons, and how Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251 compare among other top microphones in real use.
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Figure-8
vs
Polar Pattern Type
The Polar Pattern Type for Rode NTG3 is Supercardioid, and for Rode NTG3B it is also Supercardioid, so both microphones offer the same directional characteristic.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
66 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Peluso really shines with its seven polar patterns offering serious versatility for various recording moods compared to the Telefunken's three classic ones
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Studio, Voice Recording, Instrument
vs
Intended Use
Rode NTG3 is intended for Studio, Live, Podcast, Broadcast, and Video Recording uses, while Rode NTG3B is intended for Broadcast and Video Recording only, making NTG3 more versatile in professional applications.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
53 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Rode NTG3 nor Rode NTG3B are Limited Edition models, indicating both are regular production microphones.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Condenser
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Condenser
Peluso 22 251
The microphone uses a condenser design, known for sensitivity and accuracy in capturing detailed sound suitable for studio or professional use.
Telefunken ELA M 251
As a Condenser microphone, the ELA M 251E is highly sensitive, offering a wide frequency response and excellent transient detail, making it ideal for studio recording.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
63
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
The model name identifies this microphone as the Peluso 22 251, indicating its specific product identity within the Peluso brand.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The ELA M 251E is a classic large-diaphragm tube condenser microphone renowned for its smooth, open, and detailed sound profile.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
63 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
80
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
United States
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
United States
Peluso 22 251
This product is manufactured in the United States, which may influence quality standards and sourcing.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The Telefunken ELA M 251E is proudly manufactured in the United States, known for its meticulous craftsmanship and high-quality audio engineering.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
80 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Wired, XLR
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Wired, XLR
Peluso 22 251
Connectivity is wired via XLR, a standard for professional balanced audio signal transmission.
Telefunken ELA M 251
This microphone uses a Wired connection, specifically an XLR cable, to ensure a robust and high-quality audio signal transfer to recording equipment.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
48
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
2000
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
2002
Telefunken ELA M 251
The modern re-issue of the Telefunken ELA M 251E microphone was first released in 2002, bringing the classic sound to contemporary recording environments.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
36
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface, PA System, Camera
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface
Telefunken ELA M 251
The ELA M 251E is compatible with standard audio Mixer and Audio Interface units that can provide its required external power and accept an XLR input.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Silver
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Champagne
Peluso 22 251
The microphone is available in Silver color, offering a classic and professional metallic finish.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Global
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Global
Peluso 22 251
The product is launched globally, indicating worldwide availability and support.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
ELA M
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Unisex
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Unisex
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
70
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Adult, Professional
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Professional
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Application Category
What recording applications is it best for?
73
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Studio, Broadcast
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Studio
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
73 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B have the same Height of 10.04 inches, so their overall vertical size is identical.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
2.04
inch
0Votes
2.37
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The width of the microphone is 2.04 inch (5.18 cm), providing an idea of its physical size for fit and handling.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone has a width (diameter) of 2.37 inch, which is approximately 6.02 cm. This standard size fits various shock mounts and stands.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
2.04
inch
0Votes
2.37
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The microphone's depth is 2.04 inch (5.18 cm), relevant for mounting clearance and placement considerations.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone has a depth of 2.37 inch, which converts to approximately 6.02 cm. This compact diameter makes it easy to position in tight spaces or alongside other microphones.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
6
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Peluso 22 251
The package height is 6 inch (15.24 cm), which informs about the packaging size for shipping and storage.
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
1.37
lbs
0Votes
1.31
lbs
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The weight is 1.37 lbs (0.62 kg), indicating a moderately heavy unit typical of professional microphones with robust build quality.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
20
ft
0Votes
25
ft
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
It includes a 20 ft (6.10 m) cable length, providing ample length for flexible microphone placement without the need for extensions.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
lower
5.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
1.34
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Peluso 22 251
The grill diameter measures 1.34 inch (3.40 cm), which affects the microphone's pickup area and sound dispersion.
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
2.04
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Peluso 22 251
The base footprint diameter is 2.04 inch (5.18 cm), indicating the size of the base area required for stability and placement.
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
1.34
inch
1Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Capsule Diameter
The Capsule Diameter is 0.8 inches for Rode NTG3 and 0.75 inches for Rode NTG3B, making the NTG3's capsule slightly larger in diameter.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Based on community votes for Capsule Diameter,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
That 1.34 inch capsule diameter on Peluso sounds better for detailed recordings, since Telefunken doesn't list this spec.
See more
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
10
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Depth
Both the Rode NTG3 and the Rode NTG3B have a Package Depth of 14 inches, indicating identical packaging depth dimensions.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
70
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
3/8"
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Minimum Terminating Impedance
Minimum Terminating Impedance is not available for either Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, so impedance comparison is not possible.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Overload Point
The Overload Point is 128 dB for Rode NTG3 and slightly higher at 130 dB for Rode NTG3B, indicating the NTG3B can handle marginally louder sounds before distortion.
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Transformer
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Transformer
Peluso 22 251
This microphone uses a transformer design, which affects its audio character and impedance matching, often contributing to a particular warmth and signal isolation.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The ELA M 251E incorporates a Transformer in its design, contributing to its characteristic warm, rich sound and providing optimal impedance matching.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
55
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
Peluso 22 251
It features a large diaphragm capsule, which typically improves sensitivity and richness in capturing vocal and instrumental nuances.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
20
Hz
0Votes
20
Hz
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The microphone covers very low frequencies starting from 20 Hz, ensuring capture of deep bass sounds.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
24,000
Hz
0Votes
20,000
Hz
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone captures frequencies up to 20000 Hz, covering the entire audible spectrum for detailed and accurate sound reproduction.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
4,000.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-37.1
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Peluso 22 251
The sensitivity rating is -37.1 dBV/Pa, reflecting how efficiently the microphone converts acoustic pressure into an electrical signal.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
144
dB
0Votes
138
dB
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The maximum sound pressure level (Max SPL) it can handle is 144 dB, suitable for recording very loud sources without distortion.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
6.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone offers switchable directionality, supporting Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Bidirectional (Figure-8) polar patterns for versatile sound capture.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
85
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Peluso 22 251
The microphone employs a pressure gradient acoustic principle, meaning it is designed to be directional, responding differently to sound pressure from different angles.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
55
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Stepped
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Stepped
Telefunken ELA M 251
The polar patterns are selected via a Stepped switch, providing distinct, repeatable settings for Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 modes.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Switching Precision,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
85
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Condenser
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Condenser
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
85 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
12
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
15
dB
0Votes
7
dB
0Votes
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
8.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
200
ohm
0Votes
200
ohm
0Votes
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
equal
200.00 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
25
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Mono
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Mono
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
144
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Fast
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Proximity Effect Control
Neither Rode NTG3 nor Rode NTG3B offer Proximity Effect Control, meaning users cannot adjust bass boost for close-miking scenarios on both models.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
12
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-37.1
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Interface
What is the connection interface?
35
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
XLR
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
XLR
vs
Connection Interface
Both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B utilize an XLR connection interface, standard for professional audio equipment.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
Peluso 22 251
Audio output options include balanced analog signals beneficial for professional audio setups needing noise reduction.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone provides Analog, Balanced audio outputs, which is essential for professional studios to minimize noise over long cable runs.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Standard
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Standard
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone uses a Standard XLR pin configuration, ensuring compatibility with all professional audio cables and equipment without requiring special adapters.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Balanced
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Balanced
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility is not supported by Rode NTG3 but is supported by Rode NTG3B, giving the NTG3B more flexible power sourcing options.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
External Adapter, Powering Module
vs
Power Source
Both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B use Phantom power as the Power Source, a common standard for professional condenser microphones.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What is the battery type?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The type of battery used if portable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B lack Monitoring Mix Control, so direct mix monitoring is not possible from the microphones themselves.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Rode NTG3 nor Rode NTG3B support App or Software Integration, meaning they operate without digital app control.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
EQ presets are not available, meaning tone controls must be adjusted externally or via other devices.
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Onboard Controls
What onboard controls are available?
70
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Switches
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Switches
vs
Onboard Controls
Onboard Controls information is not available for both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B, so they likely do not have integrated control features.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm or Stand is not included with either Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, requiring separate purchase for mounting gear.
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Body Material
What is the body material?
75
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Brass
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Brass
Peluso 22 251
The body material is brass, known for durability and providing a distinctive tonal quality and weight.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone's body is crafted from high-quality Brass, contributing to its robust construction and aesthetic appeal.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
75 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Material on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
The microphone includes a shock mount, which helps isolate it from mechanical vibrations to reduce noise pickup caused by handling or stands.
Telefunken ELA M 251
A crucial accessory, the external shock mount helps isolate the microphone from unwanted vibrations and handling noise. This ensures cleaner recordings, especially in a professional studio setting.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Matte
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Nickel
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone features a sleek Nickel finish, providing both durability and a classic aesthetic.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B lack Swivel or Pivot Capability, so neither allows angle adjustments via a swivel joint.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Foam
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Peluso 22 251
Foam is used as the internal dampening material to reduce unwanted resonances and vibrations inside the microphone housing.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pop Filter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Metal
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Metal
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Neodymium Magnet
Neither Rode NTG3 nor Rode NTG3B use a Neodymium Magnet, indicating the magnets are of different or unspecified type.
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Cables are included with Rode NTG3 but not included with Rode NTG3B, meaning you get more out-of-the-box connectivity with NTG3.
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cables on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
This microphone does not include an extra windscreen, so additional accessories might be needed to reduce wind noise in outdoor environments.
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
55
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Hard Case
0
Telefunken ELA M 251
0Votes
Hard Case
Telefunken ELA M 251
The microphone comes packaged in a robust Hard Case to ensure its protection during transport and storage, reflecting its premium status.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
Spare parts are available for this model, allowing for maintenance and repair rather than replacement.
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
A protective foam insert is included, which helps prevent damage during transport and storage.
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters
Are adapters included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Adapters
Adapters are not included with either Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, so additional adapters must be sourced separately if needed.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B have Safety Compliance certifications, meaning both meet required safety standards.
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Compliance is confirmed for both Rode NTG3 and Rode NTG3B, showing adherence to environmental regulations.
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
This microphone does not have RoHS compliance indicator, which relates to the restriction of hazardous substances in electronics.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Professional Broadcast Certification
Professional Broadcast Certification is not present for Rode NTG3 but is present for Rode NTG3B, indicating NTG3B is certified for broadcast standards.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology is not present in Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, implying that neither model utilizes array-based directional audio capture.
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles are not available on Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, so these models provide unaltered audio capture without profile-based processing.
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode is not supported by either Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, indicating neither offers multi-directional surround audio capture.
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Peluso 22 251
Multi-pattern switching is available, enabling the user to select from different pickup patterns for varied recording conditions.
Telefunken ELA M 251
The ELA M 251E features multi-pattern switching, allowing users to select between Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Figure-8 polar patterns. This versatility makes it suitable for various recording scenarios.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251
vs
Hum-Compensating Coil
Hum-Compensating Coil is not included in either Rode NTG3 or Rode NTG3B, so neither model specifically reduces hum through coil technology.
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
