Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
63
Highlights
48
Differences
7
Reactions
0
Likes
Peluso 22 251
vs
Telefunken ELA M 251E:
63 Highlights & 48 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Get the scoop on specs and usability. Simple insights to guide your microphone choice.
Which one’s right for your setup — Peluso 22 251 or Telefunken ELA M 251E? We’ve compared their power source, onboard controls, stand/tripod & warranty, usability, and sound so you can choose the better microphone.
Features Multi-Mode Switch
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
with a difference of 83 points
Peluso 22 251 vs Telefunken ELA M 251E: A Detailed Professional Microphone Comparison
When it comes to high-end studio microphones, the Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E both cater to professional recording needs with their side-address, large-diaphragm condenser design optimized for studio and instrument applications. Both boast a professional user skill level and utilize an external power adapter, devoid of wireless or battery options. However, these microphones veer apart in their construction, audio capacity, and pricing tier. Peluso impresses with seven distinct polar patterns including stereo, supercardioid, and hypercardioid, compared to Telefunken's three classic patterns emphasizing cardioid and figure-8. Physically, Peluso fits more compactly in studios thanks to its smaller height and slightly wider capsule diameter. Pricing is a clear delineator, with Telefunken commanding a premium upwards of $12,900 and Peluso providing a budget-friendlier $1,749 option without forgoing versatility.
The Peluso 22 251: Robust Flexibility And Handling
What distinctly positions the Peluso 22 251 as a studio workhorse is its remarkable overload point of 144 dB SPL, which outstrips Telefunken's 135 dB threshold, allowing it to tackle loud sources without distortion. This microphone boasts extensive polar patterns; seven in total; that cover everything from cardioid to stereo modes, accommodating a broader range of recording techniques and environments. The inclusion of a detachable cable and a detachable mount adds to its practicality, especially for engineers who travel or set up frequently, providing ease in transport and replacement. The three-year warranty offers peace of mind for users investing in a professional condenser. Though it lacks features such as LED indicators or software integration, its solid design includes swivel and pivot capability to assist in precise placement. For users who need versatility paired with tough SPL management without astronomical costs, the Peluso 22 251 is compelling.
Telefunken ELA M 251E: Classic Broadcast-Grade Excellence
The revered Telefunken ELA M 251E remains an iconic choice prized for its legacy and pristine audio identity. Its total harmonic distortion rating of 0.2% and 20 dB gain range reinforce its role as a highly transparent and finely detailed microphone suitable for broadcast and high-fidelity studio work. Certified for professional broadcast use, it meets stringent standards in safety and environmental compliance, which adds institutional assurance absent in the Peluso offering. Though it lacks detachable cabling, it compensates with a built-in hum-compensating coil reducing electrical interference noise. Its larger height and slenderer capsule (1" diameter, 3.94" capsule length) fit classic studio setups. The two-year warranty reflects its trusted build but suggests a more conservative support plan than Peluso's.
Quick Take
Peluso 22 251 shines with its ability to handle high SPLs and offers an impressive palette of polar patterns for creative recording. Its detachable mount and cable make it well-suited for dynamic studio environments and road use. Meanwhile, the Telefunken ELA M 251E is the superstar for studios prioritizing broadcast-grade clarity, ultra-low distortion, and certified compliance, albeit at a substantial cost.
Bottom Line
For professionals seeking a versatile microphone that balances cost and features like high SPL tolerance and varied polar patterns, the Peluso 22 251 emerges as the clear winner, delivering strong performance with practical accessories. However, if your studio's budget and needs skew toward historic quality, certified broadcast standards, and a distinct sonic signature, the pricier but iconic Telefunken ELA M 251E remains a classic choice that's hard to beat.
Verdict
Winner: Peluso 22 251 ; Superior flexibility, higher SPL handling, and user-friendly design at a fraction of the price.
Runner-up: Telefunken ELA M 251E ; Legendary audio fidelity with broadcast certification, ideal for elite studios with bigger budgets.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Is Peluso 22 251 better than Telefunken ELA M 251E? Depends on your playstyle. This deep microphones breakdown includes specs, feel, tone quality, and what musicians think.
Both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E share the same side-address form factor, making their handling and positioning similar in studio setups. There is no practical difference in this aspect, so user preference will determine suitability.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Figure-8
vs
Polar Pattern Type
Peluso 22 251 offers a wider variety of polar pattern types including cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, supercardioid, hypercardioid, figure-8, and stereo, while Telefunken ELA M 251E provides only cardioid, omnidirectional, and figure-8. For versatility in recording, Peluso 22 251 is more suitable.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
66 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Peluso 22 251 is intended for studio, instrument, and voice recording, offering versatile applications. In contrast, Telefunken ELA M 251E is intended purely for studio use. Peluso 22 251 is more suitable if you need a microphone usable for diverse recording purposes.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
53 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Peluso 22 251 nor Telefunken ELA M 251E is a limited edition model. Both are standard production microphones, making them equally accessible for most professional studios.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Condenser
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Condenser
Peluso 22 251
The microphone uses a condenser design, known for sensitivity and accuracy in capturing detailed sound suitable for studio or professional use.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
A condenser microphone type, known for sensitivity and accuracy, ideal for studio recording.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
63
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
The model name identifies this microphone as the Peluso 22 251, indicating its specific product identity within the Peluso brand.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Model name is Telefunken ELA M 251E, a well-known classic large diaphragm condenser microphone prized in professional studios.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
63 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
80
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
United States
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
United States
Peluso 22 251
This product is manufactured in the United States, which may influence quality standards and sourcing.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
This product was manufactured in the United States, often associated with high production standards and quality control for audio equipment.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
80 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Silver
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Champagne
Peluso 22 251
The microphone is available in Silver color, offering a classic and professional metallic finish.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The color option available is Champagne, which offers a stylish and distinctive finish.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Professional
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Professional
vs
User Skill Level
Both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E are designed for professional skill levels, ensuring they meet high-quality production standards. This makes both suitable for professionals without compromise.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Global
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Global
Peluso 22 251
The product is launched globally, indicating worldwide availability and support.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The product is released for the global market, suitable for users internationally.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
36
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface, PA System, Camera
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Mixer, Audio Interface, PA System
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Compatible with mixers, audio interfaces, and PA systems, making it suitable for a variety of professional audio setups.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Wired, XLR
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Wired, XLR
Peluso 22 251
Connectivity is wired via XLR, a standard for professional balanced audio signal transmission.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Stand, Shock Mount
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Stand, Shock Mount
Peluso 22 251
Mounting options include stand and shock mount compatibility, providing secure and isolated mounting solutions.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Unisex
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Unisex
Telefunken ELA M 251E
This microphone has a unisex target audience, meaning it is designed for use by all genders equally.
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
48
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
2000
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
1960
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Year of Release on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Application Category
What recording applications is it best for?
73
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Studio, Broadcast
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Studio
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
73 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 measures 8.85 inches in height, while Telefunken ELA M 251E is taller at 10.63 inches. The shorter Peluso may be easier to position in tight spaces or on complex rigs.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
1.8 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 has a package depth of 10 inches versus Telefunken ELA M 251E's 12.6 inches, making Telefunken slightly deeper in packaging. Users valuing compact packaging might prefer Peluso for width but Telefunken for depth.
The shipping package’s depth.
In the battle of Package Depth,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
2.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.94
inch
0Votes
vs
Capsule Length
Capsule length for Peluso 22 251 is unavailable, while Telefunken ELA M 251E has a capsule length of 3.94 inches. This specific dimension favors Telefunken for detailed capsule size insight, which might influence mic characteristics.
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
2.04
inch
0Votes
8.5
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The width of the microphone is 2.04 inch (5.18 cm), providing an idea of its physical size for fit and handling.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Width is 8.5 inch (21.59 cm), indicating the physical size of the microphone body.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
6.5 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
2.04
inch
0Votes
2.68
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The microphone's depth is 2.04 inch (5.18 cm), relevant for mounting clearance and placement considerations.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Depth is 2.68 inch (6.81 cm), completing the microphone’s dimensional specifications.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
0.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
12
inch
0Votes
5.91
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Width
The package width of Peluso 22 251 is 12 inches, significantly larger than Telefunken ELA M 251E's 5.91 inches. This impacts portability and storage; Telefunken offers a more compact package for easier transport.
The shipping package’s width.
In the battle of Package Width,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
6.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
6
inch
0Votes
8.66
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The package height is 6 inch (15.24 cm), which informs about the packaging size for shipping and storage.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Package height is 8.66 inch (22.0 cm), corresponding to the case dimensions.
The shipping package’s height.
In the battle of Package Height,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
2.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
1.37
lbs
0Votes
1.2
lbs
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The weight is 1.37 lbs (0.62 kg), indicating a moderately heavy unit typical of professional microphones with robust build quality.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Weight is 1.2 lbs (0.54 kg), making it portable and easy to handle during sessions.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
1.34
inch
0Votes
2
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The grill diameter measures 1.34 inch (3.40 cm), which affects the microphone's pickup area and sound dispersion.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Grill diameter measures 2 inch (5.08 cm), protecting the capsule while allowing sound to pass through accurately.
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
In the battle of Grill Diameter,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
0.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
2.04
inch
0Votes
2.36
inch
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The base footprint diameter is 2.04 inch (5.18 cm), indicating the size of the base area required for stability and placement.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The base footprint diameter is 2.36 inch (5.99 cm). This size offers a stable mounting area for stands and shock mounts.
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
In the battle of Base Footprint Diameter,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
20
ft
0Votes
9.84
ft
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
It includes a 20 ft (6.10 m) cable length, providing ample length for flexible microphone placement without the need for extensions.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
10.2 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
1.34
inch
0Votes
1
inch
0Votes
vs
Capsule Diameter
Peluso 22 251 offers a capsule diameter of 1.34 inches, larger than Telefunken ELA M 251E's 1 inch. Larger capsules often contribute to richer sound capture, favoring the Peluso in detailed audio applications.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
In the battle of Capsule Diameter,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
0.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
70
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
3/8"
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
5/8"
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 has a minimum terminating impedance of 200 ohms, lower than Telefunken ELA M 251E's 1000 ohms. Lower impedance generally provides better signal integrity, so Peluso may offer cleaner performance in complex setups.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
In the battle of Minimum Terminating Impedance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
800.0 Ω
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 can handle an overload point of 144 dB, higher than the 135 dB of Telefunken ELA M 251E, offering better handling of loud sound sources without distortion. Peluso is preferable for high-SPL recording.
The SPL level where overload occurs.
In the battle of Overload Point,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
9.0 dB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Overload Point,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.2
%
0Votes
vs
THD
THD values are not available for Peluso 22 251, while Telefunken ELA M 251E has a total harmonic distortion of 0.2%. This information favors Telefunken for users prioritizing specified distortion metrics.
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
20
dB
0Votes
vs
Gain Range
Peluso 22 251 lacks gain range data, but Telefunken ELA M 251E provides a gain range of 20 dB. This suggests Telefunken offers more defined amplification flexibility, advantageous for adjusting to varying source levels.
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Peluso 22 251 nor Telefunken ELA M 251E includes proximity effect control. Users looking to manage bass boost near the mic might need external processing for both models.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
144
dB
0Votes
130
dB
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The maximum sound pressure level (Max SPL) it can handle is 144 dB, suitable for recording very loud sources without distortion.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Maximum sound pressure level (SPL) before distortion is 130 dB, which means the microphone can handle very loud sounds such as close-miked guitar amps or drums.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
14.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
55
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Large Diaphragm
Peluso 22 251
It features a large diaphragm capsule, which typically improves sensitivity and richness in capturing vocal and instrumental nuances.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
20
Hz
0Votes
20
Hz
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The microphone covers very low frequencies starting from 20 Hz, ensuring capture of deep bass sounds.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-37.1
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-36
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
The sensitivity rating is -37.1 dBV/Pa, reflecting how efficiently the microphone converts acoustic pressure into an electrical signal.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
1.1 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
12
dB
0Votes
85
dB
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Signal-to-noise ratio of 85 dB means the microphone produces a clean sound with minimal noise interference.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
In the battle of Signal-to-Noise Ratio,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
73.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
125
dB
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The dynamic range of this microphone is 125 dB, allowing it to capture very quiet and very loud sounds without distortion. This wide range is crucial for professional audio recording environments.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
25
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Mono
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Mono
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The microphone outputs a mono audio signal, providing single-channel sound capture suitable for focused recording applications.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
85
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
Peluso 22 251
The microphone employs a pressure gradient acoustic principle, meaning it is designed to be directional, responding differently to sound pressure from different angles.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
85 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
18
dB
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Off-axis rejection of 18 dB means the microphone effectively reduces sounds coming from directions other than the front, improving signal clarity.
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
55
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Stepped
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Stepped
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The polar pattern switching uses stepped control, which gives distinct selectable directional patterns such as cardioid or figure-8.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Switching Precision,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-37.1
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-36
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Output level is -36 dBV/Pa, indicating the microphone's sensitivity to sound pressure and electrical signal output strength.
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
In the battle of Output Level,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
lower
1.1 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Transformer
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Transformer
Peluso 22 251
This microphone uses a transformer design, which affects its audio character and impedance matching, often contributing to a particular warmth and signal isolation.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
85
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Condenser
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Condenser
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
85 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
24,000
Hz
0Votes
20,000
Hz
0Votes
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
4,000.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
15
dB
0Votes
9
dB
0Votes
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
6.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Cardioid, Bidirectional, Omnidirectional
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
200
ohm
0Votes
200
ohm
0Votes
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
equal
200.00 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
80
Hz
0Votes
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
144
dB
0Votes
140
dB
0Votes
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
In the battle of Headroom,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
4.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Fast
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Fast
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
In the battle of Transient Response,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
12
dB
0Votes
0
dB
0Votes
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
In the battle of Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
equal
12.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
95
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Studio-Grade
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Studio-Grade
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
In the battle of Internal Preamp Quality,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 includes a detachable cable, making it easier to replace or customize cables, while Telefunken ELA M 251E does not support cable detachment. Peluso is more user-friendly for maintenance.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Cable Detachable,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Interface
What is the connection interface?
35
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
XLR
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
XLR
vs
Connection Interface
Both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E use XLR connection interfaces, the standard for professional microphones, ensuring compatibility with most audio equipment.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
Peluso 22 251
Audio output options include balanced analog signals beneficial for professional audio setups needing noise reduction.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Audio output options include analog balanced signals, which help reduce noise interference over cable runs.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Phantom power support is included, required for powering the internal electronics of condenser microphones.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Standard
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Standard
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Uses standard XLR pin configuration, ensuring compatibility with common professional audio equipment.
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The microphone is shielded against RF interference, crucial for clear audio in environments with wireless devices.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0
ms
0Votes
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Balanced
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Balanced
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
External power supply compatibility is confirmed for both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E, ensuring dependable power delivery typical for studio microphones.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Peluso 22 251 nor Telefunken ELA M 251E has a power indicator light, so users must rely on audio interface or mixer status to confirm power.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Both microphones are powered by external adapters, lacking internal batteries, aligning with their professional studio use where phantom power or dedicated adapters are standard.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
48
Volt
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The phantom power requirement is 48 Volt, the standard voltage for most professional condenser microphones.
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Both models feature onboard controls via switches, allowing straightforward operation without complex interfaces, suitable for live and studio environments.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring mix control is not available on either Peluso 22 251 or Telefunken ELA M 251E, so user monitoring must be handled externally.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
No app or software integration is available for Peluso 22 251 or Telefunken ELA M 251E, indicating these are traditional microphones focused on audio quality over digital control.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
EQ presets are not available, meaning tone controls must be adjusted externally or via other devices.
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Mute Function
Does it have a mute function?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Mute Function
Mute functions are absent on both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E, which may require external muting through the audio interface or mixer.
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mute Function on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
LED Indicator Lights
LED indicator lights are not present in either Peluso 22 251 or Telefunken ELA M 251E, maintaining a minimalist design without visual feedback on status.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E have swivel/pivot capability, making placement and angle adjustments easy during recording sessions.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 supports a detachable mount, whereas Telefunken ELA M 251E does not. This feature gives Peluso users more flexibility in microphone mounting options.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Detachable Mount,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Neither Peluso 22 251 nor Telefunken ELA M 251E includes an adjustable arm or stand, so external mounting accessories are required.
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Body Material
What is the body material?
75
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Brass
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Metal
Peluso 22 251
The body material is brass, known for durability and providing a distinctive tonal quality and weight.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Body material is metal, ensuring durability and shielding from electromagnetic interference.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
75 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Material on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
The microphone includes a shock mount, which helps isolate it from mechanical vibrations to reduce noise pickup caused by handling or stands.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Includes a shock mount to reduce handling noise and vibrations, providing cleaner recordings.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
65
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Foam
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Foam
Peluso 22 251
Foam is used as the internal dampening material to reduce unwanted resonances and vibrations inside the microphone housing.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Internal dampening material is foam, which helps reduce unwanted vibrations and resonances inside the microphone body, enhancing sound clarity.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
In the battle of Internal Dampening Material,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Matte
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Matte
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The finish is matte, reducing reflections and fingerprints, for professional studio appearances.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
45
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Metal
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Metal
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The grill is made of metal, providing durability and protection for the capsule while influencing the acoustic characteristics slightly.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
176
°F
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The heat resistance rating is 176 °F (80 °C), allowing the microphone to operate reliably in warm environments.
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Drop Resistance
Drop resistance is not available for either microphone, suggesting users should handle both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E with care.
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Neodymium Magnet
Neither Peluso 22 251 nor Telefunken ELA M 251E includes a neodymium magnet in their design, reflecting traditional microphone magnetic systems.
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Neither microphone includes adapters, so buying additional accessories for specialized mounting or connections may be necessary for both.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is there a carrying case included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Carrying Case
Both microphones come with carrying cases, enhancing portability and protection during transport, matching user expectations for high-quality studio gear.
Whether a protective carrying case is part of the package.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
Spare parts are available for this model, allowing for maintenance and repair rather than replacement.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Spare parts are available for this microphone, enabling maintenance and repairs to extend its service life.
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
A protective foam insert is included, which helps prevent damage during transport and storage.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Protective foam insert is provided inside the case, cushioning the microphone from shocks and impacts.
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
This microphone does not include an extra windscreen, so additional accessories might be needed to reduce wind noise in outdoor environments.
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
55
Peluso 22 251
0Votes
Hard Case
0
Telefunken ELA M 251E
0Votes
Hard Case
Telefunken ELA M 251E
The microphone comes packaged in a hard case for durable transport and storage.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
55 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Telefunken ELA M 251E
This microphone comes with stickers or branding which authenticate the product and aid in identification.
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Peluso 22 251 offers a 3-year warranty compared to Telefunken ELA M 251E's 2-year warranty, providing longer protection and peace of mind for Peluso buyers.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
1.0 years
measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Environmental compliance is absent in Peluso 22 251 but present in Telefunken ELA M 251E, which may appeal to eco-conscious users choosing Telefunken.
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
This microphone does not have RoHS compliance indicator, which relates to the restriction of hazardous substances in electronics.
Telefunken ELA M 251E
This product complies with RoHS standards, meaning it meets safety and environmental requirements restricting hazardous substances.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Safety Compliance
Peluso 22 251 lacks safety compliance certification, whereas Telefunken ELA M 251E has safety compliance, making Telefunken a safer choice regarding regulatory standards.
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Telefunken ELA M 251E
This microphone has FCC/CE approval ensuring compliance with important electronic and safety standards for sale and use in many countries.
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
1Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Professional Broadcast Certification
Professional broadcast certification is unavailable for Peluso 22 251, while Telefunken ELA M 251E has it, favoring Telefunken for broadcast standard compliances.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
worse than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Based on community votes for Professional Broadcast Certification,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 1 votes.
If you need official broadcast certification, Telefunken is the way to go since it's certified unlike Peluso.
See more
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-compensating coil technology is not found in Peluso 22 251, but included in Telefunken ELA M 251E, improving noise rejection and making Telefunken preferable in electrically noisy environments.
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Based on community votes for Hum-Compensating Coil,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Neither microphone supports recording profiles, meaning both Peluso 22 251 and Telefunken ELA M 251E offer standard uncustomized recordings without preset modes.
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Surround capture mode is not available for either Peluso 22 251 or Telefunken ELA M 251E, indicating these microphones focus on traditional directional recording.
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
Yes
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
Yes
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Peluso 22 251
Multi-pattern switching is available, enabling the user to select from different pickup patterns for varied recording conditions.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
better than
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
, delivering
higher
83 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
vs
Beamforming Technology
Beamforming technology is missing in both microphones, focusing their use on conventional sound capture rather than advanced directional manipulation.
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Peluso 22 251
No
0Votes
Telefunken ELA M 251E
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Peluso 22 251 ◉ is
same as
Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Peluso 22 251 ◉
vs Telefunken ELA M 251E ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
0
Cartling
